Alright imma explain, i've never beat a single zelda games, yes i've played them but they've never fully convinced me even though i know they're really good story wise, they just didn't catch up to me...
Then i see the destructoid's A link between worlds score and i decided that i wouldn't buy the game because the reviewer may have noticed some huge flaw or something like that that other sites didn't... however i was today passing by a store and saw that golden box saying a link between worlds.
I couldn't resist myself and instantly bought it, got home started playing and couldn't stop until now just to register and post this thread.
IN WHAT WORLD IS A LINK TO THE PAST BAD? HOW THE ***** DOES IT DESERVE A 67? ARE YOU LIKE FREAKING CRAZY?
Allow me to explain, first of all:
Story so far 10/10
World design 10/10
New characters 10/10
(Some look funny but they're Zelda characters, they're supposed to be funny that's the art style).
Then the biggest part:
Yes, the way 3d was used in this game is just FLAWLESSLY, i don't know how many games in the 3ds you people have played but this is the BEST 3d game i've played on the 3ds.
Now i ask the reviewer, where did you come to the conclussion that the game was a mere "OKAY", this game is by far the most charming experience i've experienced yet on my 3ds and i feel bad that there's that "ORANGE" score to a game that deffinitely deserved full green reviews.
I just feel sad for the reviewer to be this biased, if you're really that bitter and sad, trust me man. Just go and jump from a bridge, because i don't know what're you doing with your life if you don't enjoy the good things in life, what are you even doing in the videogame industry if you're that bitter? i don't get it.
I think because of people like the reviewer we get "GREAT" platformers like that piece of shit called knack.
i'll never return to this biased piece of shit site, goodjob getting people out of this POS called destructoid, i was seriously gonna give it a try, but out of all games you pick one of the best games to date on the 3ds to give it a score like that.
Funfact for people:the reviewer didn't even bother to play the game, i can notice that easily because he keeps posting pics and crap on the review when the first thing you should learn before reviewing a 3ds game is to not bias readers who never played the game with pics because the 3D DOUBLES THE PIXELS AND ADDS A DEPTH THAT NOT EVEN A XBOX ONE/PS4 COULD ADD, yes the 3d is magnificent if excecuted well and this game did that, when the 3d is on the games becomes the most charming experience ever.
So i don't know how can a reviewer review a game if he did not play it at all.
Nope. A Link Between Worlds is the weakest Zelda title to date. I got it at launch and after 2 hours I got bored and then gave it a try sometime later. It has no charm. No actual story that hasn't been done before (stale Zelda is stale) and the gameplay is alright I guess. Did I mention it was worse than Skyward? Because it fucking was.