I really don't care for World of Goo.
DEMON'S' SOUL'S'S''
FUCK.
THIS.
GAME.
HARD.


















Obligatory CoD mention but that's too obvious; I reckon you could double back and call yourself a hipster if you like CoD.
I fail to see the the appreciation for the Uncharted series and I've been unable to stomach a Metal Gear game since MGS. And I don't like Fable.
I also don't like Angry Birds, and before it became cool to dislike Angry Birds.
Mind blown, I didn't think that was possible.
I have to say that so far I'm so glad I enjoy so many different games that get mentioned here, more fun for me I guess.
Oh so dumbed down, I complained a lot at the time about that. I really hope they release a proper challenge maps pack already.
I enjoyed Fable a lot at the time, and I think really good games could have followed on from it. Those games were never made.
I dropped $100 on Fable 3. Major buyers remorse. That's the main deal. I suppose the first two were OKAY.
I feel for you. Fable 3 was a major disappointment. Enjoyed the first one. Second was alright except it ticked me off that the co-op sucked so bad. Had the 3rd for a day, played it an hour, sent it back the next morning. It's like they took everything that was decent about Fable 2 and got rid of it.
I don't like Super Meat Boy.








Portal 2. I got so burned out on seeing it all over /r/gaming that I felt like I had been through it a dozen times without even playing it.
I think you mean better.
Saying that all of them are the same game is a bit of a fallacy. Each new entry adds new features and augments existing ones, all mostly to the better. It's kind of like saying that all of the games in the Halo or Mass Effect series are the same because they all share the same core gameplay traits.
What most people get hung up on is the way each game's story is framed. That's the most glaring similarity and many people use that as a means of presuming that they're all exactly the same. Which is understandable, to be fair - but not entirely right.
Here's a little bit of what I wrote in the Pokémon thread:
I'm gonna say yes. But it wasn't even Molyneux's promises that disappointed me. Playing it around the same time as Marrowind just made it look a little shit in comparison to me.
I've always felt in a minority group by preferring GTA4 to the PS2 era GTA games. They always seemed silly and throw away to me and I like the direction they went with GTA4. I think I like boring.
I prefer GTA2 over them all, felt more arcade-y. I really didn't like SA very much either. Not racist or anything, but I like being an Italian gangster. And hearing "busta" every five seconds was grating.
I like Leaf Green because it updated the original, but the story, characters, Pokemans, etc. just got weird to me as the series went on. Kinda like Mega Man Battle Network. Hated the later entries of that, and that StarForce or whatever crap was on the DS. I played the first one for like an hour and already wanted to beat that main character kid mercilessly with a Mettaur's pick-axe.
Oh, easy...
Resident Evil 4
Yes, it was a game that Capcom needed to make. Yes, it was a game that the survival horror genre needed to survive. Still, Capcom embracing its comic book roots like that set them on an extreme path that cut off some very interesting avenues and as a result, we're stuck with this new form of action horror that misses the original points. I was never really happy with the direction Capcom were taking after Code Veronica, anyway.