Definitely eagerly anticipating this. I loved the 'philosophy-lite' style of FC2's antagonist, and this looks to be similar. The environment also interests me a lot more than FC2, (which I didn't finish, mainly due to the aforementioned 'fight-every-checkpoint' attitude they took which became extremely tedious after a while). Basically, my room-mate and I just yell at eachother about Farcry 3 every fortnight or so.
Anyone got any input on whether either the PS3 or 360 version has less graphical problems than the other? Everywhere I ask I just get told to play it on PC, which is no good as I type this from a Mac. I'm not a big graphics whore (see: uses a Mac), but I see a lot of people mentioning the PS3 having horrible frame rates and screen tearing while the 360 apparently has some nastier, eyesore bloom/shadow/contrast issues. Input?
If you can't stand graphical issues, then play on the PC. It's a shame because I'd totally grab this game for a console if both versions weren't a technical monstrosity. It looks like a blast game-wise.
What hatman said, it's strange with games like this and Planetside 2 people have been saying it's a ball ache to run on high setting with cards like the GTX 680 yet i don't really have any issues with my 560Ti at 1600x900.