Mass Affection (Mass Effect Series)

[GlowBear]

hah should have said a toasted sandwich

[Stevil]

So you see EDI as nothing more than a sex doll?

I do.

http://vimeo.com/12915013

[Sir Legendhead]

Oh hey, you know we can embed vimeo, right?



That's pretty much all I have, because...now we're comparing Futurama to Mass Effect...? Somebody probably has the entire crossover cast drawn up on deviantArt, haha.

edit -

Actually it was on the Bioware forums! Close enough.

[Stevil]

Oooooooh....no no no nonononono. NO!

Had no idea about Vimeo. Then again, it took me six months to figure out how to embed YT videos!

[State Lemming]

I always thought the point of putting EDI and Joker into a relationship was to add a personal element if you picked the Destroy Ending.

[Sir Legendhead]

Just try to imagine Synthesis without it.

[State Lemming]

Just watched both Synthesis endings, and yeah I feel like she is kind of important in both since Joker and EDI already had a close bond beyond the synthetic/organic distinction.

[Stevil]

There's only the Destroy ending.

[State Lemming]

You don't prefer rejection?

[Stevil]

Movie Picard is not Real Picard.

[ZombiePlatypus]

They should have a little kid Picard in the new Star Trek sequel, and he should be bought out of slavery by Liam Neeson and Ewan McGregor and he'll really miss his mom and it will make him evil.

[Panzadolphin56]

Wooahhh, I missed Star Trek references

'Captain, would you like Jell-o with your icecream?'

[State Lemming]

Movie Picard is not Real Picard.

Rejection Mass Effect is not Real Mass Effect, so it works out.

[State Lemming]

They should have a little kid Picard in the new Star Trek sequel, and he should be bought out of slavery by Liam Neeson and Ewan McGregor and he'll really miss his mom and it will make him evil.

They already did an evil Picard.



But then the timelines split and he became Bane instead.

[Sir Legendhead]

Huh. Bane has a lot in common with the Reapers now that you mention it. He has a Sovereign doom-and-gloom aspect to him, including his similarly mechanical voice. They even have the same goals. The only real difference between the two is a matter of scale.

[State Lemming]

Huh. Bane has a lot in common with the Reapers now that you mention it. He has a Sovereign doom-and-gloom aspect to him, including his similarly mechanical voice. They even have the same goals. The only real difference between the two is a matter of scale.

He would've been an interesting Catalyst.

[DestructoKitteh!]

Yo guys, long time no post. I've been avoiding spoilers for Mass Effect 3 for months now and just finished my first playthrough of the game with the "bad" ending and yeah... After 35 hours of awesomeness it just shit the bed at the end there. After hours and hours of fun it starts being incredibly vague at the end for no dicernable reason. Anyway i already played through the extended cut and am happy now (Synthesis Ending) so yay, Mass Effect 3 is as awesome as it should have been to begin with now.

I am just wondering now if its worth getting the From Ashes DLC to get this Javic guy.

[Stevil]

Javik is alright character-wise, but he's hardly essential to the plot, nor does he really add anything to the situation.

He's mostly a jerk with Samara's powers and a flashy gun.

[DestructoKitteh!]

Javik is alright character-wise, but he's hardly essential to the plot, nor does he really add anything to the situation.

He's mostly a jerk with Samara's powers and a flashy gun.

So thats a no then, OK.

Cheers, Stevil.

[ZombiePlatypus]

Yeah, I never even used Javik. You'd think with him being a Prothean he'd be interesting, but he was pretty one note and boring.