I concur, vehemently.
Type: Posts; User: Nihil
I concur, vehemently.
I am but I just started a campaign as a GM that I was going to delete after filling out a sheet, because I didn't see any other immediate way to access a character sheet.
Is there a certain way you want me to send you the character sheet from roll20? Doesn't look like there's a way for me to download or link it.
Sunday is a no-go for me til 9pm pst. Not sure what all you have planned, but if it's filling out a character sheet, I can do that if you have one ready. When/if you guys go over the party dynamics,...
How so? You mean with rolls and field mechanics?
No, just curious and kind of eager.
It's been my understanding that you can utilize any edition's gameplay mechanics, regardless of the setting. Setting's just flavor-text.
I've never had a dog, so I don't really understand dog lovers becoming so damn homicidal after their pet is murdered, but I at least know not to fuck with them.
I can't create a character if I don't know what campaign we're rolling with. Forgotten Realms or wut?
lol Jesus christ. It just doesn't end.
Can you link to where this happened?
I'm not an expert, but I think that has to be built into the board's system. They use a different bulletin program.
That's not necessarily what we're talking about, although it still informs us of her character. It's her relations with her boss and others in the industry that make it a scandal.
"Go Advanced" takes you to the preview/editing page, unless you're on a mobile thing that doesn't have it or something.
In my honest opinion, it's really not something to gloss over, considering the whistleblower nature I took from it. The cheating aspect I couldn't give a shit less about.
It's the underbelly of...
Two sides of the same coin.
One doesn't have to take her word - Same as you don't have to ask her for the "metrics" in order to believe she's done what she said she did, even bearing how...
Facts have been provided in this thread by the other side. It's up to the people on the other-other side whether they want to sift through these pages to find them.
PM responded to.
I'm taking care of it, EL. Quit goading.
By the way, I don't mind a contrarian opinion. Red Morgan pulls that shit all the time, but at least you can understand his side of the argument and it doesn't involve trite remarks and drawing lines...
He thinks people are being unfair in their assessments of Anita and Zoe, without anything to prove the contrary. It devolves the discussion into petty accusation flinging.
By the way, I'm calling you out for this, Nobrein.
Fucking convince me what's so awesome about them that I should become thought police in here whenever someone brings up all the reasons their...
If you want to make a productive counter-argument to the statements in here, yes.
Spell it out for us heathens what they done that supersedes any criticism of their ethics, ever.
It's conjecture, sure. But yours is no better.
Bring something relevant to the table that truly proves their worth as feminists, or quit crying about how we're being meanies.
What you're not allowed to do is instigate lopsided arguments with everyone here who doesn't. Is that too much to ask?